Platform
Solutions
Integrations
Case studies
Resources
Pricing Start free Request a demo Log in
Voice bot QA · AI voice agents in production

Voice bot QA on every call — before the customer reports the failure.

Your AI voice agent takes thousands of calls a day. Your QA team listens to thirty. Ender Turing transcribes and scores every bot conversation against the scorecard your human agents are held to, flags the failure types you define — looping, interruptions, wrong information, missed disclosures — and alerts the owner the day they spike. In any language.

100% of bot calls scored Any language 4.8/5 on G2
Claims-intake bot · this week Every call scored
Calls scored
12,480
Identity verified correctly
96%
Consent line said
91%
Goal completed
78%
Failure types flaggedlooping 1.4% · wrong info 0.9% · interruptions 3.1%
Alerts this week2 · consent line dropped in Spanish after the release

Example week—illustrative numbers, not customer data.

The problem

The bot takes 10,000 calls a day. QA listens to 30.

A voice agent fails differently from a human: not one bad call, but the same failure on every call of a kind, until a customer complains or a release note explains it. Sampling cannot catch that. Reading every call can.

Failures found by customers, not by QA.

A looping menu, a wrong answer, a dropped consent line — live for days at bot volume before anyone hears one.

Every release changes the bot's behavior.

A prompt tweak, a new intent, a model update — and yesterday's sample says nothing about today's calls.

The bot and the humans are measured differently.

Containment rate for the bot, scorecards for the agents. Nobody can say which one handles a claims intake better.

Three languages, one QA team.

The Spanish flow breaks and the English-speaking reviewers never notice.

So bot quality stays a feeling — and a risk.

Compliance lines, wrong information, hallucinated promises: at 10,000 calls a day, a 1% failure is 100 customers every day.

What changes

Score every bot call. Alert on the failure, not the sample.

Ender Turing analyzes the calls your voice agent already has — from your telephony platform, an app, the API or upload — and holds them to the scorecard you define.

Before

A sample of bot calls, listened to weekly.

After

Every bot call transcribed and scored.

AutoQA answers your scorecard on 100% of conversations; every score links to the moment in the recording. See Scorecards ↗

Before

Failure types known from complaints.

After

Failure types defined, counted, filtered.

Looping, interruptions, wrong or missing information, hallucinated promises — as topics and scorecard points, with their share per bot, language and week. See Topics ↗

Before

Compliance lines assumed.

After

Required lines checked on every call.

Identity verification, consent, disclosures — a script-adherence score from 0 to 100% per call, per language. See Compliance rules ↗

Before

Finding out after the release.

After

An alert the day a failure type spikes.

Automations notify the owner or queue the calls for review when a threshold is crossed; Charts compare this week's bot against the last release's. See Enders ↗

Before

Bot and humans on different metrics.

After

Bot vs human on one board.

The same scorecard, the same topics, side by side on the Dashboard and the executive boards — so the routing decision is made on evidence. See C-Level Boards ↗

You define the scorecard and the failure types. Ender Turing does the listening and the analysis — on every call, in any language.

Your stack stays

The bot keeps talking where it talks.

TEL

Telephony and contact-center platforms

Bot calls recorded by Genesys, Five9 and other platforms arrive through documented apps and connectors — the same path your human agents' calls take.

API

Your bot platform

A voice-agent platform that keeps its own recordings hands them over through the REST API, SFTP or upload, with the metadata that names the bot, the version and the flow.

CRM

Summaries into your CRM

A structured summary per bot call — outcome, key points, open issue — generated by your own prompt in Gen AI Studio and delivered through the CRM connector, so the human team sees what the bot did.

Production QA, not simulation: Ender Turing scores the real calls your bot has, after they end. It does not build or host the bot, and it does not generate test calls — it tells you, every day, how the live bot actually performed.

Under the hood

AI voice agent quality assurance, by name.

Every promise on this page is a documented function in the product. Here is what does what — and the guide for each.

1

The scorecard, answered on every call

Scorecards hold what a good bot call contains; AutoQA answers every point on every conversation. The accuracy of each automated point against your reviewers is shown and improves from their reviews.

2

Failure types and required lines

Topics classify each call by what happened — looping, wrong information, interruption, escalation; Compliance rules score whether the bot said the lines it must say, 0–100% per call.

3

Alerts and review queues

Enders (automations) — a call matches a failure type → notify the bot owner; a score falls below the threshold → add it to a reviewer's TODO. In-app and by email through Notifications.

4

This release vs the last one

Charts compare bots, versions, languages and periods — with a shadow period for before/after a release; C-Level Boards put the bot's quality next to the human team's for the routing decision.

5

Ask the bot's week a question

Chat with EnderGPT answers "where did the bot lose the customer this week?" with citations to the exact calls; Scheduled chats send the same question every Monday. Discovery finds every call where a phrase was said.

6

Languages, names and privacy

Any language; Speech Recognition Quality auto-corrections keep product and brand names right; Anonymization masks personal data in transcripts per language.

What the owner of the bot gets

A failure rate you can see every morning — and act on the same day.

Teams running voice agents are not managed by containment rate alone. They need to know what the bot did on each call, which failures are growing, and whether the bot beats the human on the flows it owns.

Failure rate

Per failure type, per language, per release.

Looping, wrong information, interruptions, missed lines — counted on every call, trended week over week, with the calls that prove it.

Time to detect

The day, not the quarter.

A failure that starts after a release is a spike on the chart and an alert in the inbox — before it is a pattern in the complaints.

Compliance

Required lines said — with the score to show the auditor.

Identity, consent, disclosures: a script-adherence score per call, filterable, exportable.

Bot vs human

Which one should own the flow.

The same scorecard on both, side by side — so the routing decision rests on quality, not on a hunch.

"Ender is an excellent AI solution for quality monitoring of customer consultations across various channels. It provides real-time scoring for every conversation, helping us identify areas for improvement in implementing our solutions."

Early access

Replay your calls against the new bot version — before it goes live.

Take a set of real production calls, replay the same customer inputs against your updated bot, and score the new version on the same scorecard as the old one — before the release, not after the complaints. Available for early tests with selected teams. Write us if you need this.

Fit

Built for teams running AI voice agents in production.

In-house CX teams that own a bot, BPOs running client-specific voice agents, and the product teams shipping the bot — anyone who must answer "how did the bot perform today?" with evidence.

  • Bots and human agents scored on the same scorecard, compared on the same board.
  • Failure types and required lines defined once, checked on every call in every language.
  • SOC 2 Type II examination completed; GDPR-compliant data handling; private cloud or on-premise on Enterprise.

Not the fit if you are looking for a tool to build or simulate the bot: Ender Turing scores the calls the live bot has.

Voice bot QA FAQ

The questions teams ask before scoring their bot.

How do you QA voice bots?

The way you QA human agents, at bot volume: define what a good call is — a scorecard of points plus the failure types you want caught — and let AutoQA answer it on every conversation the bot has. Ender Turing transcribes each bot call, scores it against the scorecard, tags the failure types it finds, and links every finding to the exact moment in the recording. Reviewers calibrate the AI on a sample; the AI listens to and analyzes everything.

How do you grade voice agent calls automatically?

Ender Turing marks a scorecard as automated and AutoQA answers every point on every call — did the bot confirm the identity, offer the right option, close the loop — with the accuracy of each point against your human reviewers shown and improved from their reviews. Failure types such as looping, interruptions, wrong or missing information and hallucinated promises are defined as topics and scorecard points, so they are counted, filtered and alerted like any other criterion.

How can a QA team triage 10,000 voice agent calls a day without hiring more reviewers?

By not listening to them. Ender Turing scores all 10,000 automatically; the team works from the findings — the calls flagged for a failure type, the ones below the score threshold, the ones where a required line was missing — and Enders (automations) route those to a reviewer's queue or notify the owner the moment they appear. Reviewers spend their hours on the exceptions and on calibrating the AI, not on sampling.

How are voice agent conversations monitored, and how granular is the dashboard?

Every bot call lands in Ender Turing as it is recorded, is scored, and appears on the Dashboard filtered by bot, language, topic, failure type or period; Charts compare bots, versions and periods against a shadow period, and C-Level Boards put the bot's quality next to the human team's. Enders (automations) turn a threshold into an alert — a spike in a failure type, a compliance line missed — delivered in-app and by email.

Does it work across languages — English, Spanish, Polish, Mandarin?

Any language. Production speech recognition today covers English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, German, Polish, Ukrainian, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese and more; a language we do not run yet is added on request or connected through your own speech-recognition engine, so no team is turned away for its language. A bot answering in three languages is scored on the same scorecard in each, and auto-corrections keep product and brand names transcribed right in every one.

Can a BPO QA many client-specific voice agents without writing every check by hand?

Yes. Each client's bot gets its own scorecard and topics — installed from the Templates Library and adjusted, not written from scratch — and its own view on the Dashboard and C-Level Boards; Roles decide which client sees which bot. The same reviewers calibrate across clients; the AI does the reading for all of them.

Are there open-source tools for automated QA scoring of voice bot interactions?

Ender Turing is not open source, and the open-source options we know score transcripts you already have rather than capturing, transcribing and scoring production calls end to end. If the question behind the search is cost, the free plan scores up to 1,000 calls a month at no charge, no expiry — enough to score a sample of a bot's production calls and see the failure types before any business case.

Can I trial a voice agent QA platform before making the internal business case?

Yes. Start free: connect or upload a sample of the bot's calls, score them against a scorecard installed from a template, and take the failure rate and the examples into the business case. Production volumes and bot-specific pricing are agreed with us — talk to us or book a demo when the sample has made the point.

Do you simulate thousands of test calls against the bot?

Not today — Ender Turing scores the real calls your bot has in production, which is where the failures that matter appear: real accents, real interruptions, real edge cases. Replaying a set of real production calls against your updated bot version — and scoring the new version on the same scorecard before it goes live — is available for early tests with selected teams: write us on this page if you need it.

How does this fit insurance or banking bots — claims intake, verification, consent?

Regulated flows are what scorecards and compliance rules were built for: the required lines the bot must say (identity verification, consent, disclosures) are checked on every call with a script-adherence score, personal data in transcripts can be masked per language with Anonymization, and Ender Turing has completed a SOC 2 Type II examination with GDPR-compliant data handling on every plan; Enterprise adds private cloud or on-premise deployment.

Security, hosting regions, sub-processors and response times are documented on the Data Security page; SOC 2 Type II examination completed.

Every bot call, scored

See how your voice agent actually performed today.

Bring a sample of the bot's calls; leave with the failure rate, the examples and a scorecard your reviewers already agree with.