Failures found by customers, not by QA.
A looping menu, a wrong answer, a dropped consent line — live for days at bot volume before anyone hears one.
Your AI voice agent takes thousands of calls a day. Your QA team listens to thirty. Ender Turing transcribes and scores every bot conversation against the scorecard your human agents are held to, flags the failure types you define — looping, interruptions, wrong information, missed disclosures — and alerts the owner the day they spike. In any language.
Example week—illustrative numbers, not customer data.
A voice agent fails differently from a human: not one bad call, but the same failure on every call of a kind, until a customer complains or a release note explains it. Sampling cannot catch that. Reading every call can.
A looping menu, a wrong answer, a dropped consent line — live for days at bot volume before anyone hears one.
A prompt tweak, a new intent, a model update — and yesterday's sample says nothing about today's calls.
Containment rate for the bot, scorecards for the agents. Nobody can say which one handles a claims intake better.
The Spanish flow breaks and the English-speaking reviewers never notice.
Compliance lines, wrong information, hallucinated promises: at 10,000 calls a day, a 1% failure is 100 customers every day.
Ender Turing analyzes the calls your voice agent already has — from your telephony platform, an app, the API or upload — and holds them to the scorecard you define.
A sample of bot calls, listened to weekly.
AutoQA answers your scorecard on 100% of conversations; every score links to the moment in the recording. See Scorecards ↗
Failure types known from complaints.
Looping, interruptions, wrong or missing information, hallucinated promises — as topics and scorecard points, with their share per bot, language and week. See Topics ↗
Compliance lines assumed.
Identity verification, consent, disclosures — a script-adherence score from 0 to 100% per call, per language. See Compliance rules ↗
Finding out after the release.
Automations notify the owner or queue the calls for review when a threshold is crossed; Charts compare this week's bot against the last release's. See Enders ↗
Bot and humans on different metrics.
The same scorecard, the same topics, side by side on the Dashboard and the executive boards — so the routing decision is made on evidence. See C-Level Boards ↗
You define the scorecard and the failure types. Ender Turing does the listening and the analysis — on every call, in any language.
Bot calls recorded by Genesys, Five9 and other platforms arrive through documented apps and connectors — the same path your human agents' calls take.
A voice-agent platform that keeps its own recordings hands them over through the REST API, SFTP or upload, with the metadata that names the bot, the version and the flow.
A structured summary per bot call — outcome, key points, open issue — generated by your own prompt in Gen AI Studio and delivered through the CRM connector, so the human team sees what the bot did.
Production QA, not simulation: Ender Turing scores the real calls your bot has, after they end. It does not build or host the bot, and it does not generate test calls — it tells you, every day, how the live bot actually performed.
Every promise on this page is a documented function in the product. Here is what does what — and the guide for each.
Scorecards hold what a good bot call contains; AutoQA answers every point on every conversation. The accuracy of each automated point against your reviewers is shown and improves from their reviews.
Topics classify each call by what happened — looping, wrong information, interruption, escalation; Compliance rules score whether the bot said the lines it must say, 0–100% per call.
Enders (automations) — a call matches a failure type → notify the bot owner; a score falls below the threshold → add it to a reviewer's TODO. In-app and by email through Notifications.
Charts compare bots, versions, languages and periods — with a shadow period for before/after a release; C-Level Boards put the bot's quality next to the human team's for the routing decision.
Chat with EnderGPT answers "where did the bot lose the customer this week?" with citations to the exact calls; Scheduled chats send the same question every Monday. Discovery finds every call where a phrase was said.
Any language; Speech Recognition Quality auto-corrections keep product and brand names right; Anonymization masks personal data in transcripts per language.
Teams running voice agents are not managed by containment rate alone. They need to know what the bot did on each call, which failures are growing, and whether the bot beats the human on the flows it owns.
Looping, wrong information, interruptions, missed lines — counted on every call, trended week over week, with the calls that prove it.
A failure that starts after a release is a spike on the chart and an alert in the inbox — before it is a pattern in the complaints.
Identity, consent, disclosures: a script-adherence score per call, filterable, exportable.
The same scorecard on both, side by side — so the routing decision rests on quality, not on a hunch.
"Ender is an excellent AI solution for quality monitoring of customer consultations across various channels. It provides real-time scoring for every conversation, helping us identify areas for improvement in implementing our solutions."
Take a set of real production calls, replay the same customer inputs against your updated bot, and score the new version on the same scorecard as the old one — before the release, not after the complaints. Available for early tests with selected teams. Write us if you need this.
In-house CX teams that own a bot, BPOs running client-specific voice agents, and the product teams shipping the bot — anyone who must answer "how did the bot perform today?" with evidence.
Not the fit if you are looking for a tool to build or simulate the bot: Ender Turing scores the calls the live bot has.
The way you QA human agents, at bot volume: define what a good call is — a scorecard of points plus the failure types you want caught — and let AutoQA answer it on every conversation the bot has. Ender Turing transcribes each bot call, scores it against the scorecard, tags the failure types it finds, and links every finding to the exact moment in the recording. Reviewers calibrate the AI on a sample; the AI listens to and analyzes everything.
Ender Turing marks a scorecard as automated and AutoQA answers every point on every call — did the bot confirm the identity, offer the right option, close the loop — with the accuracy of each point against your human reviewers shown and improved from their reviews. Failure types such as looping, interruptions, wrong or missing information and hallucinated promises are defined as topics and scorecard points, so they are counted, filtered and alerted like any other criterion.
By not listening to them. Ender Turing scores all 10,000 automatically; the team works from the findings — the calls flagged for a failure type, the ones below the score threshold, the ones where a required line was missing — and Enders (automations) route those to a reviewer's queue or notify the owner the moment they appear. Reviewers spend their hours on the exceptions and on calibrating the AI, not on sampling.
Every bot call lands in Ender Turing as it is recorded, is scored, and appears on the Dashboard filtered by bot, language, topic, failure type or period; Charts compare bots, versions and periods against a shadow period, and C-Level Boards put the bot's quality next to the human team's. Enders (automations) turn a threshold into an alert — a spike in a failure type, a compliance line missed — delivered in-app and by email.
Any language. Production speech recognition today covers English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, German, Polish, Ukrainian, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese and more; a language we do not run yet is added on request or connected through your own speech-recognition engine, so no team is turned away for its language. A bot answering in three languages is scored on the same scorecard in each, and auto-corrections keep product and brand names transcribed right in every one.
Yes. Each client's bot gets its own scorecard and topics — installed from the Templates Library and adjusted, not written from scratch — and its own view on the Dashboard and C-Level Boards; Roles decide which client sees which bot. The same reviewers calibrate across clients; the AI does the reading for all of them.
Ender Turing is not open source, and the open-source options we know score transcripts you already have rather than capturing, transcribing and scoring production calls end to end. If the question behind the search is cost, the free plan scores up to 1,000 calls a month at no charge, no expiry — enough to score a sample of a bot's production calls and see the failure types before any business case.
Yes. Start free: connect or upload a sample of the bot's calls, score them against a scorecard installed from a template, and take the failure rate and the examples into the business case. Production volumes and bot-specific pricing are agreed with us — talk to us or book a demo when the sample has made the point.
Not today — Ender Turing scores the real calls your bot has in production, which is where the failures that matter appear: real accents, real interruptions, real edge cases. Replaying a set of real production calls against your updated bot version — and scoring the new version on the same scorecard before it goes live — is available for early tests with selected teams: write us on this page if you need it.
Regulated flows are what scorecards and compliance rules were built for: the required lines the bot must say (identity verification, consent, disclosures) are checked on every call with a script-adherence score, personal data in transcripts can be masked per language with Anonymization, and Ender Turing has completed a SOC 2 Type II examination with GDPR-compliant data handling on every plan; Enterprise adds private cloud or on-premise deployment.
Security, hosting regions, sub-processors and response times are documented on the Data Security page; SOC 2 Type II examination completed.
Bring a sample of the bot's calls; leave with the failure rate, the examples and a scorecard your reviewers already agree with.